Self-Study Evidence Dakota State University
#	Description	Type	Apply To
1	Carnegie Classification Verification	Other Measures
2	State Dept of Ed Program Approval	State-specific Evidence	x.5 State Standards (if applicable)
3	Checklist for Initial Student Teaching Visit	Other Measures	2.1 Partners co-construct mutually beneficial P-12 partnerships 2.2 Partners co-select, prepare, evaluate, support, and retain high-quality clinical educators 2.3 Partners design high-quality clinical experiences
4	Employment Data	Data Results	3.1 Recruits and supports high-quality and diverse candidate pool
5	Dispositions Survey	Other Measures	1.1 Understanding of InTASC Standards 2.3 Partners design high-quality clinical experiences 3.3 Monitors attributes and dispositions beyond academic ability 5.1 Effective quality assurance system that monitors progress using multiple measures x.1 Diversity x.3 IB / SI / TI
6	Disposition Data	Data Results	1.1 Understanding of InTASC Standards 2.3 Partners design high-quality clinical experiences 3.3 Monitors attributes and dispositions beyond academic ability 5.1 Effective quality assurance system that monitors progress using multiple measures x.1 Diversity
7	Teaching Work Sample Handbook	Other Measures	1.1 Understanding of InTASC Standards 1.2 Use of research and evidence to measure students' progress 2.3 Partners design high-quality clinical experiences 3.5 Candidate positive impacts on P-12 students x.1 Diversity x.2 Technology x.3 IB / SI / TI
8	Scripted Observation Form	Other Measures	2.3 Partners design high-quality clinical experiences 3.5 Candidate positive impacts on P-12 students x.3 IB / SI / TI
9	Employer Survey	Other Measures	1.1 Understanding of InTASC Standards 1.5 Model and apply technology standards 4.3 Employer satisfaction 5.5 Relevant stakeholders are involved in program evaluation x.1 Diversity x.2 Technology x.3 IB / SI / TI
10	Employer Survey Data	Data Results	1.1 Understanding of InTASC Standard 1.5 Model and apply technology standards 4.1 Completer impact on student growth and learning 4.2 Completer effectiveness via observations and/or student survey 4.3 Employer satisfaction 5.5 Relevant stakeholders are involved in program evaluation x.1 Diversity x.2 Technology
11	Alumni Survey	Other Measures	1.1 Understanding of InTASC Standards 1.5 Model and apply technology standards 4.4 Completer satisfaction x.2 Technology x.3 IB / SI / TI
12	Alumni Survey Data	Data Results	1.1 Understanding of InTASC Standards 1.5 Model and apply technology standards 4.4 Completer satisfaction x.2 Technology 13 Community Service Verification Other Measures 2.3 Partners design high-quality clinical experiences x.3 IB / SI / TI
13	Community Service verification	Other Measures	2.3 Partners design high quality clinical experiences x.3 IB / SI / TI
14	Field Experience Timesheet	Other Measures	2.3 Partners design high-quality clinical experiences x.1 Diversity
15	PEC Structure per Policy Manual	Other Measures	2.1 Partners co-construct mutually beneficial P-12 partnerships
16	SAM Agenda	Other Measures	3.2 Sets selective admission requirements
17	SAM Spreadsheet-Sample	Other Measures	3.2 Sets selective admission requirements
18	SAM Committee Minutes_2013	Other Measures	3.2 Sets selective admission requirements
19	SAM Committee Minutes_2014	Other Measures	3.2 Sets selective admission requirements
20	SAM Committee Minutes_2015	Other Measures	3.2 Sets selective admission requirements
21	Praxis II: Content - Aggregated Data	Data Results	1.1 Understanding of InTASC Standards 3.2 Sets selective admission requirements 3.5 Candidate positive impacts on P-12 students
22	Praxis II: Content - Disaggregated Data	Data Results	1.1 Understanding of InTASC Standards 3.2 Sets selective admission requirements 3.5 Candidate positive impacts on P-12 students
23	Praxis II: PLT - Aggregated Data	Data Results	1.1 Understanding of InTASC Standards 3.5 Candidate positive impacts on P-12 students
24	Praxis II: PLT - Disaggregated Data	Data Results	1.1 Understanding of InTASC Standards 3.5 Candidate positive impacts on P-12 students
25	Level I Survey	Other Measures	1.1 Understanding of InTASC Standards 2.3 Partners design high-quality clinical experiences 3.3 Monitors attributes and dispositions beyond academic ability 5.1 Effective quality assurance system that monitors progress using multiple measures x.1 Diversity x.3 IB / SI / TI
26	Level II Survey	Other Measures	1.1 Understanding of InTASC Standards 2.3 Partners design high-quality clinical experiences 3.3 Monitors attributes and dispositions beyond academic ability 5.1 Effective quality assurance system that monitors progress using multiple measures x.1 Diversity x.3 IB / SI / TI
27	Level I & II Data	Data Results	1.1 Understanding of InTASC Standards 2.3 Partners design high-quality clinical experiences 3.3 Monitors attributes and dispositions beyond academic ability 5.1 Effective quality assurance system that monitors progress using multiple measures x.1 Diversity
28	Level III Assessment	EPP-wide Assessment Instrument	1.1 Understanding of InTASC Standards 1.5 Model and apply technology standards 2.3 Partners design high-quality clinical experiences 3.3 Monitors attributes and dispositions beyond academic ability 3.4 Creates and monitors candidate progress 4.2 Completer effectiveness via observations and/or student surveys 5.1 Effective quality assurance system that monitors progress using multiple measures x.1 Diversity x.2 Technology x.3 IB / SI / TI
29	Level III Data-Aggregated	Data Results	1.1 Understanding of InTASC Standards 1.5 Model and apply technology standards 2.3 Partners design high-quality clinical experiences 3.3 Monitors attributes and dispositions beyond academic ability 3.4 Creates and monitors candidate progress 4.2 Completer effectiveness via observations and/or student surveys 5.1 Effective quality assurance system that monitors progress using multiple measures x.1 Diversity x.2 Technology
30	Level III Disaggregated Data	Data Results	1.1 Understanding of InTASC Standards 1.5 Model and apply technology standards 2.3 Partners design high-quality clinical experiences 3.3 Monitors attributes and dispositions beyond academic ability 3.4 Creates and monitors candidate progress 4.2 Completer effectiveness via observations and/or student surveys 5.1 Effective quality assurance system that monitors progress using multiple measures x.1 Diversity x.2 Technology
31	Student Teacher Assessment Form	EPP-wide Assessment Instrument	1.1 Understanding of InTASC Standards 1.3 Application of content and pedagogical knowledge 1.4 All P-12 students afforded access to college- and career-ready standards. .5 Model and apply technology standards 2.2 Partners co-select, prepare, evaluate, support, and retain high-quality clinical educators 2.3 Partners design high-quality clinical experiences 3.3 Monitors attributes and dispositions beyond academic ability 3.5 Candidate positive impacts on P-12 students 3.6 Candidates understand the expectation of the profession x.1 Diversity x.2 Technology x.3 IB / SI / TI
32	STAF Data-Aggregated	Data Results	1.1 Understanding of InTASC Standards 1.3 Application of content and pedagogical knowledge 1.4 All P-12 students afforded access to college- and career-ready standards. 1.5 Model and apply technology standards 2.2 Partners co-select, prepare, evaluate, support, and retain high-quality clinical educators 2.3 Partners design high-quality clinical experiences 3.3 Monitors attributes and dispositions beyond academic ability 3.5 Candidate positive impacts on P-12 students 3.6 Candidates understand the expectation of the profession 4.2 Completer effectiveness via observations and/or student surveys x.1 Diversity x.2 Technology
33	STAF Data-Disaggregated	Data Results	1.1 Understanding of InTASC Standards 1.3 Application of content and pedagogical knowledge 1.4 All P-12 students afforded access to college- and career-ready standards. 1.5 Model and apply technology standards 2.2 Partners co-select, prepare, evaluate, support, and retain high-quality clinical educators 3.3 Monitors attributes and dispositions beyond academic ability 3.5 Candidate positive impacts on P-12 students 3.6 Candidates understand the expectation of the profession 4.2 Completer effectiveness via observations and/or student surveys x.1 Diversity x.2 Technology
34	Teaching Work Sample Rubric	EPP-wide Assessment Instrument	1.1 Understanding of InTASC Standards 1.2 Use of research and evidence to measure students' progress 2.3 Partners design high-quality clinical experiences 3.5 Candidate positive impacts on P-12 students x.1 Diversity x.2 Technology x.3 IB / SI / TI
35	TWS Aggregated Data	Data Results	1.1 Understanding of InTASC Standards 1.2 Use of research and evidence to measure students' progress 2.3 Partners design high-quality clinical experiences 3.5 Candidate positive impacts on P-12 students 4.1 Completer impact on student growth and learning x.1 Diversity x.2 Technology
36	TWS Disaggregated Data	Data Results	1.1 Understanding of InTASC Standards 1.2 Use of research and evidence to measure students' progress 2.3 Partners design high-quality clinical experiences 3.5 Candidate positive impacts on P-12 students 4.1 Completer impact on student growth and learning x.1 Diversity x.2 Technology
37	Lesson Plan Format	Other Measures	1.4 All P-12 students afforded access to college- and career-ready standards. 3.6 Candidates understand the expectation of the profession x.1 Diversity x.3 IB / SI / TI
38	Lesson Plan Rubric	EPP-wide Assessment Instrument	1.4 All P-12 students afforded access to college- and career-ready standards. 3.6 Candidates understand the expectation of the profession x.1 Diversity x.2 Technology x.3 IB / SI / TI
39	Lesson Plan Assessment-Aggregated Data	Data Results	1.4 All P-12 students afforded access to college- and career-ready standards. 3.6 Candidates understand the expectation of the profession x.1 Diversity x.2 Technology
40	Lesson Plan Assessment-Disaggregated Data	Data Results	1.4 All P-12 students afforded access to college- and career-ready standards. 3.6 Candidates understand the expectation of the profession x.1 Diversity x.2 Technology
41	Admission to TE Interview	EPP-wide Assessment Instrument	3.3 Monitors attributes and dispositions beyond academic ability x.3 IB / SI / TI
42	TE Interview - Aggregated Data	Data Results	3.3 Monitors attributes and dispositions beyond academic ability
43	TE Interview - Disaggregated Data	Data Results	3.3 Monitors attributes and dispositions beyond academic ability
44	e-Portfolio Rubric	EPP-wide Assessment Instrument	x.2 Technology x.3 IB / SI / TI
45	e-Portfolio Aggregated Data	Data Results	x.2 Technology
46	e-Portfolio Disaggregated	Data Results	x.2 Technology
47	Coop Tchr Eval by Univ Supv	Other Measures	2.2 Partners co-select, prepare, evaluate, support, and retain high-quality clinical educators x.3 IB / SI / TI
48	Prof Development Plan-Field Experiences	Other Measures	2.2 Partners co-select, prepare, evaluate, support, and retain high-quality clinical educators
49	Univ Supv Eval by Coop Tchr	Other Measures	2.2 Partners co-select, prepare, evaluate, support, and retain high-quality clinical educators x.3 IB / SI / TI
50	Coop Tchr Eval by Student Tchr	Other Measures	2.2 Partners co-select, prepare, evaluate, support, and retain high-quality clinical educators x.3 IB / SI / TI
51	Univ Supv Eval by Student Tchr	Other Measures	2.2 Partners co-select, prepare, evaluate, support, and retain high-quality clinical educators x.3 IB / SI / TI
52	Adm to Teacher Ed Application	Other Measures	3.2 Sets selective admission requirements x.3 IB / SI / TI
53	Adm to Student Teaching Application	Other Measures	3.2 Sets selective admission requirements x.3 IB / SI / TI
54	DSU Strategic Plan	Other Measures	3.1 Recruits and supports high-quality and diverse candidate pool x.1 Diversity
55	Recruitment Plan	Other Measures	3.1 Recruits and supports high-quality and diverse candidate pool 5.2 Quality assurance system relies on measures yielding reliable, valid, and actionable data. 5.3 Results for continuous program improvement are used x.1 Diversity x.2 Technology
56	Standard 2 Overview	Other Measures	2.1 Partners co-construct mutually beneficial P-12 partnerships 2.2 Partners co-select, prepare, evaluate, support, and retain high-quality clinical educators 2.3 Partners design high-quality clinical experiences x.1 Diversity x.2 Technology
57	Standard 3 Overview	Other Measures	3.1 Recruits and supports high-quality and diverse candidate pool 3.2 Sets selective admission requirements 3.3 Monitors attributes and dispositions beyond academic ability 3.4 Creates and monitors candidate progress 3.5 Candidate positive impacts on P-12 students 3.6 Candidates understand the expectation of the profession
58	Standard 4 Overview	Other Measures	4.1 Completer impact on student growth and learning 4.2 Completer effectiveness via observations and/or student surveys 4.3 Employer satisfaction 4.4 Completer satisfaction
59	Standard 5 Overview	Other Measures	5.1 Effective quality assurance system that monitors progress using multiple measures 5.2 Quality assurance system relies on measures yielding reliable, valid, and actionable data. 5.3 Results for continuous program improvement are used 5.4 Measures of completer impact are analyzed, shared and used in decision-making 5.5 Relevant stakeholders are involved in program evaluation
60	Diversity Overview	Other Measures	x.1 Diversity
61	Field Experience Time Sheet	Other Measures	2.3 Partners design high-quality clinical experiences x.1 Diversity
62	Validity Crosswalk	Other Measures	5.2 Quality assurance system relies on measures yielding reliable, valid, and actionable data. x.3 IB / SI / TI
63	Danielson Correlated to InTASC	Other Measures	5.2 Quality assurance system relies on measures yielding reliable, valid, and actionable data. x.3 IB / SI / TI
64	Ed Expo Confirmation	Other Measures	3.1 Recruits and supports high-quality and diverse candidate pool
65	Affirmative Action - PEC	Other Measures	x.1 Diversity
66	Advising Checksheet	Other Measures	5.1 Effective quality assurance system that monitors progress using multiple measures
67	Special Education MAP	Other Measures	5.1 Effective quality assurance system that monitors progress using multiple measures
68	Diversity & Technology Conf Program-2012	Other Measures	x.1 Diversity x.2 Technology
69	Diversity & Technology Conf Program-2013	Other Measures	x.1 Diversity x.2 Technology
70	Diversity & Technology Conf Program-2014	Other Measures	x.1 Diversity x.2 Technology
71	Partnership Agreement	Other Measures	2.1 Partners co-construct mutually beneficial P-12 partnerships
72	List of Partner Schools	Other Measures	2.1 Partners co-construct mutually beneficial P-12 partnerships
73	Disclosure of Convictions	Other Measures	3.3 Monitors attributes and dispositions beyond academic ability
74	Expectations for Professional Conduct	Other Measures	3.3 Monitors attributes and dispositions beyond academic ability 3.6 Candidates understand the expectation of the profession
75	Professional Performance Appraisal System Form	Other Measures	3.3 Monitors attributes and dispositions beyond academic ability
76	Conceptual Framework	Other Measures	1.1 Understanding of InTASC Standards 1.2 Use of research and evidence to measure students' progress 1.3 Application of content and pedagogical knowledge 1.5 Model and apply technology standards 2.3 Partners design high-quality clinical experiences 3.3 Monitors attributes and dispositions beyond academic ability 3.6 Candidates understand the expectation of the profession 4.2 Completer effectiveness via observations and/or student surveys 5.4 Measures of completer impact are analyzed, shared and used in decision-making x.2 Technology
77	Criminal Background Check Materials	Other Measures	3.1 Recruits and supports high-quality and diverse candidate pool 3.2 Sets selective admission requirements 3.3 Monitors attributes and dispositions beyond academic ability 3.6 Candidates understand the expectation of the profession
78	Candidate GPA, ACT and Related Indicators	Data Results	1.2 Use of research and evidence to measure students' progress 3.1 Recruits and supports high-quality and diverse candidate pool 3.2 Sets selective admission requirements 3.4 Creates and monitors candidate progress
79	AFI Response	Other Measures	x.4 Previous AFI / Weaknesses